Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

www.ccun.org

www.aljazeerah.info
 

2026 News

 

Al-Jazeerah History

Archives 

Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  

Editorials

Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  

Isdood 

Islam  

News  

News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)  

www.aljazeerah.info

 

Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

***

Netanyahu Is Making Sure Trump Can't Find a Way Out of Israel's War on Iran

 By Jonathan Cook  

March 30, 2026

***
   

Israel's war of regional supremacy will not end with Iran by David Hearst (March 4, 2026).

How Israel wants to reshape the Middle East (March 15, 2026).

 
***

Israel is making sure Trump can't find an off-ramp in Iran

By Jonathan Cook

 March 30, 2026 

Netanyahu pitched the war as a repeat of Israel’s apparent 'audacious feat' of smashing Hezbollah.

The US president should have noted, instead, Israel’s moral and strategic defeat in Gaza. Instead.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must have persuaded Donald Trump that a war on Iran would unfold much like the pager attack in Lebanon 18 months ago. 

The two militaries would jointly decapitate the leadership in Tehran, and it would crumble just as Hezbollah had collapsed - or so it then seemed - after Israel assassinated Hassan Nasrallah, the Lebanese group’s spiritual leader and military strategist.

If so, Trump bought deeply into this ruse. He assumed that he would be the US president to "remake the Middle East" - a mission his predecessors had baulked at since George W Bush’s dismal failure to achieve the same goal, alongside Israel, more than 20 years earlier. 

Netanyahu directed Trump’s gaze to Israel’s supposed "audacious feat" in Lebanon. The US president should have been looking elsewhere: to Israel’s colossal moral and strategic failure in Gaza. 

There, Israel spent two years pummelling the tiny coastal enclave into dust, starving the population, and destroying all civilian infrastructure, including schools and hospitals.

Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters

Netanyahu publicly declared that Israel was "eradicating Hamas", Gaza’s civilian government and its armed resistance movement that had refused for two decades to submit to Israel’s illegal occupation and blockade of the territory. 

Iran, which has been readying for this fight for decades, has plenty of surprises in store should they dare to invade

In truth, as pretty much every legal and human rights expert long ago concluded, what Israel was actually doing was committing genocide - and, in the process, tearing up the rules of war that had governed the period following the Second World War. 

But two and a half years into Israel’s destruction of Gaza, Hamas is not only still standing, it is in charge of the ruins.

Israel may have shrunk by some 60 percent the size of the concentration camp the people of Gaza are locked into, but Hamas is far from vanquished. 

Rather, Israel is the one that has retreated to a safe zone, from which it is resuming a war of attrition on Gaza’s survivors.

Surprises in store

When considering whether to launch an illegal war on Iran, Trump should have noted Israel’s complete failure to destroy Hamas after pounding this small territory -  the size of the US city of Detroit - from the air for two years.

That failure was all the starker given that Washington had provided Israel with an endless supply of munitions. 

Even sending in Israeli ground forces failed to quell Hamas’ resistance. These were the strategic lessons the Trump administration should have learnt.

Oops, we have wrecked another country Read More »

If Israel could not overwhelm Gaza militarily, why would Washington imagine the task of doing so in Iran would prove any easier?

After all, Iran is 4,500 times larger than Gaza. It has a population, and military, 40 times bigger. And it has a fearsome arsenal of missiles, not Hamas’ homemade rockets. 

But more important still, as Trump is now apparently learning to his cost, Iran -  unlike Hamas in isolated Gaza -  has strategic levers to pull with globe-shattering consequences.

Tehran is matching Washington’s climb up the escalation ladder rung by rung: from hitting US military infrastructure in neighbouring Gulf states, and critical civilian infrastructure such as energy grids and desalination plants, to closing the Strait of Hormuz, the passage through which much of the world’s oil and energy supplies are transported. 

Tehran is now sanctioning the world, depriving it of the fuel needed to turn the wheels of the global economy, in much the same way that the West sanctioned Iran for decades, depriving it of the essentials needed to sustain its domestic economy. 

Unlike Hamas, which had to fight from a network of tunnels under the flat, sandy lands of Gaza, Iran has a terrain massively to its military advantage. 

Granite cliffs and narrow coves along the Strait of Hormuz provide endless protected sites from which to launch surprise attacks. Vast mountain ranges in the interior offer innumerable hiding places - for the enriched uranium the US and Israel demand Iran hand over, for soldiers, for drone and missile launch sites, and for weapons production plants.

The US and Israel are smashing Iran’s visible military-related infrastructure, but - just as Israel discovered when it invaded Gaza - they have almost no idea what lies out of sight. 

They can be sure of one thing, however: Iran, which has been readying for this fight for decades, has plenty of surprises in store should they dare to invade.

No trust in Trump

The main problem for Trump, the US narcissist-in-chief, is that he is no longer in charge of events - beyond a series of soundbites, alternating between aggression and accommodation, that appear only to have enriched his family and friends as oil markets rise and fall on his every utterance. 

Trump lost control of the military fight the moment he fell for Netanyahu’s pitch.

The US and Israel are smashing Iran’s visible military-related infrastructure, but - just as Israel discovered in Gaza - they have almost no idea what lies out of sight

He may be commander-in-chief of the strongest military in the world, but he has now found himself unexpectedly in the role of piggy in the middle.

He is largely powerless to bring to an end an illegal war he started. Others now dictate events. Israel, his chief ally in the war, and Iran, his official enemy, hold all the important cards. Trump, despite his bravado, is being dragged along in their tailwind. 

He can declare victory, as he has repeatedly sounded close to doing. But, having released the genie from the bottle, there is little he can actually do to bring the fighting to a close.

Unlike the US, Israel and Iran have an investment in keeping the war going for as long as either can endure the pain. Each regime believes - for different reasons - that the struggle between them is existential. 

Israel, with its zero-sum world-view, is afraid that, were the military playing field in the Middle East to be levelled by Iran matching Israel’s nuclear-power status, Tel Aviv would no longer exclusively have Washington’s ear.

It would no longer be able, at will, to spread terror across the region. And it would have to reach a settlement with the Palestinians, rather than its preferred plan to commit genocide and ethnically cleanse them.

Similarly, Iran has concluded - based on recent experience - that the US, and especially Trump, can no more be trusted than Israel.

In 2018, in his first term, the US president tore up the nuclear deal signed by his predecessor, Barack Obama. Last summer Trump launched strikes on Iran in the midst of talks.

And then late last month he unleashed this war, just as renewed talks were on the brink of success, according to mediators.

Trump’s words are worthless. He could agree to terms tomorrow, but how could Tehran ever be sure that it would not face another round of strikes six months later?

Iran looks to the fate of Gaza over the past two decades. Israel began by blockading the territory, and putting the population on a diet that intensified if they refused to keep quiet in their concentration camp.

Then Israel began "mowing the lawn" every few years - that is, pounding the enclave with air strikes. And Israel ended by unleashing a genocide.

The leaders of Iran are not willing to risk going down that path.

Instead, they believe they need to teach the US a lesson it won’t soon forget. Iran seeks to inflict so much havoc on the global economy, and US client states in the Gulf, that Washington dare not consider a sequel.

This week, the New York Times reported that Iranian strikes had left many of the 13 US military bases in the region "all but uninhabitable". The 40,000 American troops in the Gulf have had to be “relocated to hotels and office spaces”, including thousands who have been “dispersed… as far away as Europe". 

Stoking the flames

As becomes clearer by the day, US and Israeli interests over Iran are now in opposition. 

Trump needs to bring calm back to the markets as soon as possible to avoid a global depression and, with it, the collapse of his domestic support. He must find a way to reimpose stability. 

Suez was the death knell for the British empire. Hormuz may do the same for the US Read More »

With air strikes failing to dislodge either the ayatollahs or the Revolutionary Guard, he has one of two courses of action open to him: either climb down and engage in humiliating negotiations with Iran, or try to topple the regime through a ground invasion and impose a leader of his choosing. 

But given the fact that Iran is not done wreaking damage on the US, and has zero reason to trust Trump’s good faith, Washington is being driven inexorably towards the second path.

Israel, on the other hand, bitterly opposes the first option, negotiations, which would take it back to square one. And it suspects the second option is unachievable.

The primary lesson from Gaza is that Iran’s vast terrain is likely to make invading troops sitting ducks for attack from an unseen enemy. 

And there is far too much support for the leadership among Iranians - even if westerners never hear of it - for Israel and the US to foist on the populace the pretender to the throne, Reza Pahlavi, who has been cheering on the bombing of his own people safely from the sidelines. 

Israel initiated this war with an entirely different agenda. It seeks chaos in Iran, not stability. That is what it has been trying to engineer in Gaza and Lebanon - and there is every sign it is seeking the same outcome in Iran.

This should have long been understood in Washington. 

This week, Jake Sullivan, Joe Biden’s former national security adviser, cited recent comments by Danny Citrinowicz, a former veteran Israeli military intelligence lead on Iran, that Netanyahu’s aim is to "just break Iran, cause chaos". Why? "Because," says Sullivan, "as far as they’re concerned, a broken Iran is less of a threat to Israel."

That is the reason Israel keeps assassinating Iranian leaders, as it did earlier in Gaza, in the knowledge that even more belligerent figures will take their place. It wants radicalised, vengeful leaders who refuse to engage, not pragmatists ready to talk.

That is why Israel is targeting civilian infrastructure in Iran, as it did in Gaza and is doing right now in Lebanon, to instil hopelessness and foment division, and to provoke Tehran to lash out in retaliation, provoking more outrage from Iran’s Gulf neighbours and drag the US in still deeper.

That is why Israel has been covertly liaising with - and doubtless arming - minority groups in and around Iran, as it has again done in Gaza and Lebanon, in the hope that it can stoke the flames of internal dissolution yet higher.

States in civil war, consumed by their own internal battles, pose little threat to Israel.

Confusing messages

In typical fashion, Trump is sending confusing messages. He is seeking to negotiate - though with whom is unclear - while amassing troops for a ground invasion.

It is hard to analyse the US president’s intentions because his utterances make precisely no strategic sense. 

It is hard to analyse the US president’s intentions because his utterances make precisely no strategic sense

On Wednesday night, he told a fundraiser in Washington that Iran wanted to “make a deal so badly”, then added: “They’re afraid to say it because they figure they’ll be killed by their own people. They’re also afraid they’ll be killed by us.” 

This is not the logic of a superpower looking to shore up its own authority, and restore order to the region. It is the logic of a cornered crime boss, hoping that a last desperate roll of the dice may disrupt his rivals’ plans sufficiently to turn the tables on them.

That roll of the dice looks likely to be a plan to send US special forces to occupy Kharg Island, the main hub for Iran’s oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz. 

Trump appears to think that he can hold the island as ransom, demanding Tehran reopen the Strait or lose its access to its own oil.

According to diplomats, Iran is not only refusing to concede control over the Strait but threatening to carpet-bomb the island - and US forces on it - rather than give Trump leverage. Tehran is also warning that it will start targeting shipping in the Red Sea, a second waterway vital to the transport of oil supplies from the region. 

It still has cards to play.

This is a game of chicken Trump will struggle to win. All of which leaves the Israeli leadership sitting pretty. 

Trump has called Middle East wars 'crazy', but the US-Israel war on Iran may be the craziest yet Read More »

If Trump ups the stakes, Iran will do so too. If Trump declares victory, Iran will keep firing to underscore that it decides when things come to a halt. And in the unlikely event that the US makes major concessions to Tehran, Israel has manifold ways to stoke the flames again. 

In fact, though barely reported by the western media, it is actively fuelling those fires already.

It is destroying south Lebanon, using the levelling of Gaza as the template, and preparing to annex lands south of the Litani River in accordance with its imperial Greater Israel agenda

It is still killing Palestinians in Gaza, still shrinking the size of their concentration camp, and still blockading aid, food and fuel. 

And Israel is stepping up its settler-militia pogroms against Palestinian villages in the Occupied West Bank, in preparation for the ethnic cleansing of what was once assumed to be the backbone of a Palestinian state. 

Sullivan, Biden’s senior adviser, noted that Israel’s vision of a “broken Iran” was not in America's interests. It risked prolonged insecurity in the Strait of Hormuz, the collapse of the global economy, and a mass exodus of refugees from the region towards Europe.

That would further deepen a European economic crisis already blamed on immigrants. It would strengthen nativist sentiment that far-right parties are already riding in the polls. It would bolster the legitimacy crisis already faced by European liberal elites, and justify growing authoritarianism.

In other words, it would foment across Europe a political climate even more conducive to Israel’s supremacist, might-is-right agenda. 

Trump’s off-ramp is elusive. And Israel will do its level best to make sure it stays that way. 

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

***

Jonathan Cook is the author of three books on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and a winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. His website and blog can be found at www.jonathan-cook.net Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form.

Israel is making sure Trump can't find an off-ramp in Iran | Middle East Eye

***


Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner./font>

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org.

editor@aljazeerah.info & editor@ccun.org